Charles Oren ANDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ron ANGELONE, Et Al., Defendant-Appellee

Good Law
86 F.3d 932·96 Daily Journal DAR 7181·1996 WL 342232·35 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 430·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 14862
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 20, 199694-15319California1,297 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hall, J.

Charles Oren Anderson, a minister of the Universal Life Church, sued under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 to challenge three Department of Prisons Administrative Regulations which forbade him from leading a congregation of inmates. The district court dismissed Anderson’s action, finding that it did not state a claim under the First Amendment as set forth in Turner v. Safley, 482 U.S. 78 , 107 S.Ct. 2254 , 96 L.Ed.2d 64 (1987). Anderson appealed, contending: (1) that the district court treated the government’s motion to dismiss as a motion for summary judgment without explaining how motions for summary judgment operate; (2) that the district court erred in any event by dismissing his claim under Turner , and (3) that the district court should address his claim under the Religious Freedom and Restoration Act (“RFRA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000bb et seq. In response, the Prison Director Ron Angelone argues that RFRA is unconstitutional as it violates both the Establishment Clause and the separation of powers doctrine. We reverse on the first ground raised by Anderson.

I.

Charles Anderson is an inmate at the Southern Desert Correctional Center in Nevada. On March 1, 1993, he was ordained a minister by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.