Fleeger

Fleeger v. Bell

Good Law
23 F. App'x 741
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 26, 2001Nos. CV-99-01565-PMP, CV-00-00051-PMP, CV-00-00070-PMP, CV-99-01565-PMP-RJJ, 00-15942, 00-15944, 00-15945, 00-15958-00-15960, 00-15962, 00-16362California546 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM *

Matthew Fleeger, Antranik Hindoyan, Arthur Cruz, Lloyd Clifton Lane, Hadi Bahadori, George Solomon and Gary Tigar (“Appellants”) appeal the district court’s grant of judgment on the pleadings in favor of Desert Palace Inc., Caesars Palace, Las Vegas Hilton Hotel & Casino, MGM Grand Hotel & Casino, Aztar Corp., *743 Sahara Hotel Casino, Tropicana Hotel & Casino, Harr ah’s Las Vegas, Inc., Mirage Hotel & Casino, Stewart L. Bell and Scott Doyle (“Appellees”). Appellants argue that the district court incorrectly applied state law when it held that a marker is a check under Nevada Revised Statute (“N.R.S.”) 205.130(1). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(2) and we AFFIRM.

Because the parties are familiar with the facts, we recite only those facts integral to our decision.

1. Standard of Review

We review Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(c) dismissals de novo. See Fajardo v. County of Los Angeles, 179 F.3d 698, 699 (9th Cir.1999). A judgment on the pleadings is properly granted when, taking all allegations in the pleadings as true, the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Id.

2. Markers are Checks under N.R.S. 205.130(1)

Appellants…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.