Bilbud Rancho California Ltd. v. Johnson & Johnson Development Corp.

Good Law
86 F.3d 1161·1996 WL 266445·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 42040
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 17, 199694-55709California2,940 words

Opinion

Opinion

86 F.3d 1161 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. BILBUD RANCHO CALIFORNIA LTD., a California limited partnership; Billy J. Dendy; Edward W. Barksdale, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION; William P. Johnson; Dean Allen; John Augustine; Brian Wieck; Rancho California City Associates IIA; Patricia D. Johnson; Donald W. Callender, individually and as trustee of the Donald W. Callender Family Trust; Omni Restaurant Consulting Corp.; Bruce V. Baumann & Paul G. Baumann Partnership; Bruce V. Bauman, individually and as trustee for the VB & P Baumann, Inc. Money Purchase Pension Plan; Robert G. Thompson, individually and as trustee UTA June 9, 1992; Rancho California Industrial Complex I, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-55709. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 13, 1995. Decided May 17, 1996. Before: HUG, Chief Judge, and BEEZER and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Appellants…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.