Carroll v. Maui County

86 F.3d 1161 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. William P. CARROLL; Jo Ann Carroll, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MAUI COUNTY; Linda Crockett Lingle; George N. Kaya; Eassie Miller; Melvin Hipolito; Jerry Morgan; Ian Suzuki; Steven Parabicoli; Victor Moreland; Harold Yee, et al, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-15607. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 10, 1996. * Decided May 31, 1996. Before: FLETCHER, D.W. NELSON and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 William P. Carroll appeals the district court's dismissal of his personal and class action claims under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act ("RICO"), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-68 , against Maui County and nine individual defendants. We must decide whether Carroll and the class members have sustained an injury to business or property cognizable under 18 U.S.C. § 1964 (c). We conclude that they have not, and we affirm the judgment of the district court. 3 Because…