In Re John W. Guthrie, Debtor. John W. Guthrie v. Pacific Security Companies, Inc.

86 F.3d 1162 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re John W. GUTHRIE, Debtor. John W. GUTHRIE, Appellant, v. PACIFIC SECURITY COMPANIES, INC., Appellee. No. 95-35849. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 20, 1996. * Decided May 29, 1996. Before: BROWNING, REINHARDT, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Guthrie appeals pro se from a decision of the bankruptcy appellate panel (BAP) affirming a summary judgment entered by the bankruptcy court. The BAP had jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158 (b). We have jurisdiction over this timely appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158 (d), and we affirm. 3 Guthrie argues that the 1990 nonjudicial foreclosure sale of the Tacoma fourplexes to Pacific Securities Company (Pacific) was valid as to two-thirds of the price paid because his co-owners and co-obligors were not in bankruptcy. He argues that the automatic stay entered when he filed for bankruptcy voided only the sale of his…