Jeffrey E. Jernigan v. United States Air Force

86 F.3d 1162 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jeffrey E. JERNIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES AIR FORCE, Defendant-Appellee. No. 95-35191. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 20, 1996. * Decided May 29, 1996. Before: BROWNING, REINHARDT, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jeffrey Earl Jernigan appeals pro se the district court's judgment on the pleadings in favor of the Air Force in Jernigan's action purportedly brought under the Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA"), 5 U.S.C. § 522 , and the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a. The district court concluded that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over Jernigan's action because the Feres doctrine bars claims for injuries to military personnel which occur in the course of military service. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We affirm in part, and reverse and remand in part. 3 We review de novo a district court's determination that it…