Gary Eugene Kukes v. Candance J. Grubbs Carole J. Caldwell L. Gerald

Good Law
86 F.3d 1162·1996 WL 285561·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 42021
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 29, 199695-16688California362 words

Opinion

Opinion

86 F.3d 1162 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Gary Eugene KUKES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Candance J. GRUBBS; Carole J. Caldwell; L. Gerald, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-16688. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 20, 1996. * Decided May 29, 1996. Before: BROWNING, REINHARDT and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 California state prisoner Gary Eugene Kukes appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to state a claim. Kukes alleged that the Butte County clerk-recorder, a court reporter, and the Oroville Justice court clerk altered and removed transcripts from the record of his 1986 trial that led to his unlawful conviction of second degree murder. Kukes sought $2.5 million in damages from each defendant. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We construe the dismissal to be without prejudice. See Trimble v. City of Santa Rosa, 49 F.3d 583, 585 (9th Cir.1995).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.