Richard Lee Sisk James Piatt v. Cso Branch R. Austin Lt. Hilton

86 F.3d 1163 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Richard Lee SISK; James Piatt, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CSO BRANCH; R. Austin; Lt. Hilton, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-16737. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 20, 1996. * Decided May 29, 1996. Before: BROWNING, REINHARDT, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Richard Lee Sisk, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's judgment partially in favor of defendant prison officials in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. 1 Sisk contends that the district court erred by finding in favor of the prison officials on several of his due process claims concerning his prison disciplinary proceeding. Sisk also contends that the district court erred by awarding him only nominal damages on one of his due process claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 Because a stipulated trial was held based upon all the evidence in the record, we…