Ruth Quintanilla-Reyes De Gutierrez Valodia Gutierrez-Quintanilla Daniel Noel Gutierrez-Simpson v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
86 F.3d 1163·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 41974
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 23, 199694-70923California800 words

Opinion

Opinion

86 F.3d 1163 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ruth QUINTANILLA-REYES de GUTIERREZ; Valodia Gutierrez-Quintanilla; Daniel Noel Gutierrez-Simpson, Petitioners, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 94-70923. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 14, 1996. * Decided May 23, 1996. Before: ALARCON, BEEZER, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ruth Quintanilla-Reyes de Gutierrez, her husband, and their minor son, natives and citizens of Nicaragua, petition for review of the dismissal by the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA") of their appeal from an immigration judge's decision finding them deportable as charged and denying their applications for asylum and withholding of deportation pursuant to 8 U.S.C. §§ 1158 (a), 1253(h). We deny the petition for review. 3 * Quintanilla contends that the BIA erred in refusing to grant the family asylum under 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (a). We disagree. 4 Under §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.