Jerardo Rodriguez v. Al Chandler

Good Law
86 F.3d 1163·1996 WL 285676·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 41988
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 29, 199695-36032California1,442 words

Opinion

Opinion

86 F.3d 1163 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jerardo RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Al CHANDLER, Defendant-Appellee. No. 95-36032. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 20, 1996. * Decided May 29, 1996. Before: BROWNING, REINHARDT and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jerardo Rodriguez, an Oregon state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's grant of prison officials' motion to dismiss his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failing to state a claim. Rodriguez alleges that defendants violated his First Amendment and Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection and Due Process rights when they: 1) retaliated against him for filing prison grievances; and 2) barred him from filing any subsequent prison grievances. 1 We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We affirm in part as to Rodriguez' Fourteenth Amendment claims. We reverse and remand to the district court as to his First Amendment claims. 3 We review de…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.