United States v. Sno Carl Adderly

86 F.3d 1163 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sno Carl ADDERLY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-16494. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 20, 1996. * Decided May 29, 1996. Before: BROWNING, REINHARDT, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Sno Carl Adderly, a federal prisoner, appeals the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion challenging his sentence and guilty plea conviction for armed robbery ( 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (a)) and use of a deadly weapon in the commission of a crime of violence ( 18 U.S.C. § 924 (c)). Adderly contends that the district court erred by (1) failing to retroactively apply Amendment 489 of the Sentencing Guidelines and (2) failing to provide an adequate statement of reasons for its choice of sentence. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 . We review de novo, Sanchez v. United States, 50 F.3d 1448, 1451-52 (9th Cir.1995), and we…