William Michael Neyland v. J.H. Crabtree, Warden S.B. Sales, Lieutenant, Sheridan, Or

86 F.3d 1163 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. William Michael NEYLAND, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J.H. CRABTREE, Warden; S.B. Sales, Lieutenant, Sheridan, OR, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-35288. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 20, 1996. * Decided May 29, 1996. Before: BROWNING, REINHARDT, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 William M. Neyland, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his action under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). Neyland contends that placing him in lock-down and segregation and transferring him to a different facility following a prison riot violated his constitutional rights. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. 3 On February 15, 1995, the district court dismissed Neyland's complaint without prejudice and gave him thirty days to file an amended complaint. On March 7, 1995, Neyland filed a motion for an…