Newman By and Through Newman v. United States

Good Law
86 F.3d 1163·1996 WL 279846·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 41992
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 23, 199695-15443California409 words

Opinion

Opinion

86 F.3d 1163 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Elisabeth NEWMAN; Christina Newman, By and Through Guardian ad Litem Steve Newman; Allison Newman, By and Through Guardian ad Litem Steve Newman; Jonathan Newman, By and Through Guardian ad Litem Steve Newman; Steve Newman, individually; Holly H. Newman; Micah Newman, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, and Doe 1 through Doe 8, Inclusive, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-15443. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 16, 1996. Decided May 23, 1996. Before: ALARCON, BEEZER, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Steve Newman, on behalf of his daughter Elisabeth Newman and other family members, 1 (collectively Newman) appeals the district court's entry of summary judgment in favor of the United States (government) on his negligence claim under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346 (b) et seq. Newman's claim arose out of burn injuries Elisabeth…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.