United States v. Jose Mauro Guel-Perez

Good Law
86 F.3d 1164·1996 WL 285579
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 29, 199695-30221California1,039 words

Opinion

Opinion

86 F.3d 1164 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Mauro GUEL-PEREZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-30221. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 20, 1996. * Decided May 29, 1996. Before: BROWNING, REINHARDT, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Guel-Perez appeals from the district court's restitution order following his guilty plea to Interstate Transportation with Intent to Engage in Sexual Activity, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2423 (a), and Travel Interstate with Intent to Engage in Sexual Activity with a Juvenile, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2423 (b). The district court had jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3231 . We have jurisdiction over this timely appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742 . We affirm. 3 We review the court's restitution order for an abuse of discretion provided that it is within the bounds of the statutory…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.