United States v. Alvin Pipkin Owens

86 F.3d 1164 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alvin Pipkin OWENS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-10456. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 17, 1996. * Decided May 21, 1996. Before: ALARCON, BEEZER, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Alvin Pipkin Owens appeals his convictions on four counts of knowingly making false statements on loan applications submitted to four different federally insured financial institutions for the purpose of influencing the actions of the institutions on the loan applications in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1014 . We have jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 * Owens argues that there was insufficient evidence to support his convictions because the government failed to introduce any evidence that Owens himself made the false statements on the four loan applications. We disagree. 4 Stefan Ammos identified Owens's…