United States v. Giovanni Fontes Scolari

Good Law
86 F.3d 1165·1996 WL 285703·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 41920
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 29, 199695-50347California322 words

Opinion

Opinion

86 F.3d 1165 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Giovanni Fontes SCOLARI, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-50347. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 20, 1996. * Decided May 29, 1996. Before: BROWNING, REINHARDT, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Giovanni Fontes Scolari appeals his sentence of 151 months under the Sentencing Guidelines, imposed on remand following his guilty plea conviction for possession with intent to distribute cocaine. Scolari contends that the district court arbitrarily resentenced him to the middle of the applicable Guidelines range. 1 We review de novo, United States v. Johnson, 953 F.2d 1167, 1173 (9th Cir.) cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 226 (1992), and affirm. 3 The district court is required to provide a statement of reasons for choosing a particular sentence if the span of the applicable Guidelines exceeds twenty-four months. United States v. Howard, 894…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.