In re Yarom
Opinion
Opinion
86 F.3d 1165 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re Izhak YAROM and Viviane Yarom, Debtors, Raymond L. ASHER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Izhak YAROM, a/k/a Itzhak Yarom, a/k/a Izahk Yarom, a/k/a Ighak Yarom, a/k/a Ishak Yarom, a/k/a Ike Yarom, d/b/a Ventura Auto Sales, a/k/a Ventura A.S., and Ike's Automotive, a/k/a Ike's Auto, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-56000. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 20, 1996. * Decided May 29, 1996. Before: BROWNING, REINHARDT, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Chapter 7 debtor Izhak Yarom appeals the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel's ("BAP") affirmance of the bankruptcy court's order finding nondischargeable, under 11 U.S.C. § 523 (a)(2), (6), a state court award of compensatory damages ($4,750) and punitive damages ($12,500) in favor of Raymond Asher in connection with an automobile purchase by Asher. The bankruptcy court held that compensatory damages owed by Yarom for fraud were…