Jerry D. Webb v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Good Law
86 F.3d 1165·1996 WL 285718·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 41922
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 29, 199695-70635California252 words

Opinion

Opinion

86 F.3d 1165 77 A.F.T.R.2d 96 -2341, 96-2 USTC P 50,374 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jerry D. WEBB, Petitioner-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee. No. 95-70635. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 20, 1996. * Decided May 29, 1996. Before: BROWNING, REINHARDT, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jerry D. Webb ("Webb") appeals pro se the Tax Court's decision, after remand from this Court, denying his motion to vacate the final judgment for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, dismissing his petition for failure to prosecute, and awarding damages to the government in the amount of $5,000 under 26 U.S.C. § 6673 . We have jurisdiction pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 7482 . We review de novo, Billingsley v. Commissioner, 868 F.2d 1081, 1084 (9th Cir.1989), and we affirm for the reasons stated by the Tax Court in its supplemental memorandum decision filed May 4, 1995. 3 We have considered…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.