Louis J. Vadino v. Banco De Entre Rios

86 F.3d 1165 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Louis J. VADINO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BANCO DE ENTRE RIOS, Defendant-Appellee. No. 95-55170. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 10, 1996. * Decided May 23, 1996. Before: HALL, O'SCANNLAIN and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Plaintiff-Appellant Louis Vadino appeals from the district court's order dismissing his complaint on forum non conveniens and international comity grounds and from the court's order dismissing the Province of Entre Rios, Argentina as a defendant in this suit. We affirm. I. 3 Vadino argues that the district court abused its discretion in dismissing his case on forum non conveniens grounds. In a forum non conveniens dismissal, the party moving for dismissal must demonstrate two things: (1) the existence of an adequate alternative forum; and (2) that the balance of relevant private and public interest factors favor dismissal. Creative Technology, Ltd. v.…