Hanford Guards Union of America, Local Union No. 21 v. Fluor Daniel Hanford, Inc.
23 F. App'x 861
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 11, 2002Nos. 00-35620, 00-35646; D.C. No. CV-99-5087-FVSCalifornia57 words
Lead Opinion
MEMORANDUM *
We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. The appellant failed to exhaust its administrative remedies under the applicable collective bargaining agreements.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.