Sol F. Marx Harry F. Crooks and Dallas D. Hann v. Loral Corporation, a New York Corporation Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Inc., an Arizona Corporation Goodyear Aerospace Corporation, an Arizona Corporation, Sol F. Marx Harry F. Crooks and Dallas D. Hann, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Loral Corporation, a New York Corporation Goodyear Aerospace Corporation, an Arizona Corporation

Good Law
87 F.3d 1049·96 Daily Journal DAR 7411·20 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1425·35 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 489·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 15129
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 24, 199693-17078California4,097 words

Opinion

Opinion

87 F.3d 1049 35 Fed.R.Serv.3d 489 , 20 Employee Benefits Cas. 1425 , 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4589 , 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7411 , Pens. Plan Guide P 23921D Sol F. MARX; Harry F. Crooks; and Dallas D. Hann, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. LORAL CORPORATION, a New York Corporation; Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Inc., an Arizona Corporation; Goodyear Aerospace Corporation, an Arizona Corporation, Defendants-Appellees. Sol F. MARX; Harry F. Crooks; and Dallas D. Hann, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. LORAL CORPORATION, a New York Corporation; Goodyear Aerospace Corporation, an Arizona Corporation, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 93-17078, 93-17213. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 6, 1995. Decided June 24, 1996. Daniel Offidani, Scottsdale, Arizona, for plaintiffs-appellants-cross-appellees. Stephen Greiner, Willkie, Farr & Gallagher, New York City, for defendants-appellees-cross-appellants Loral Corporation and Goodyear Aerospace Corporation. James J. Trimble, Fennemore Craig, Phoenix, Arizona, for defendants-appellees Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company. Appeal from the United States District…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.