Adesanya v. Prunty

87 F.3d 1317 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Olusesan J. ADESANYA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bud PRUNTY; D. Perez; W. Young; J. Builtman; R.A. Ballard, Ltn., P.W. Perkins; R. Ricks; G.J. Janda aka Genda; H.W. Willming; H. Bard; R. Rogers, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-56754. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 11, 1996. * Decided June 18, 1996. Before: CANBY, NOONAN and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 California state prisoner, Olusesan Adesanya, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of prison staff in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Adesanya contends that the district court erred by finding that prison officials were entitled to qualified immunity for their actions regarding his disciplinary proceedings and for serving him a cold meal. In addition, Adesanya contends that the district court erred by concluding that Adesanya had failed to demonstrate an actual injury in support of his claimed denial…