Vera Armstrong Cherry v. Rocking Horse Ridge Estates Association R. Joe Jenkins Carla Moore Cindy Schaldenbrand Aviva Goelman Kay Cantrell Steve Keiser County of Orange Royal Trc, D/B/A Royal Health Care Center United Western Medical Center Carole Lipinski Cheri Blanchard Fiore, Nordberg, Walker & Woolf-Willis, Vera Armstrong Cherry v. Kay Cantrell Fiore, Nordberg, Walker & Woolf-Willis, and Rocking Horse Ridge Estates R. Joe Jenkins Carla Moore Cindy Schaldenbrand Aviva Goelman Steve Keiser County of Orange Royal Trc, D/B/A Royal Health Care Center United Western Medical Center Carole Lipinski Cheri Blanchard

Good Law
87 F.3d 1317·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 31391
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 14, 199694-56629California930 words

Opinion

Opinion

87 F.3d 1317 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Vera Armstrong CHERRY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ROCKING HORSE RIDGE ESTATES ASSOCIATION; R. Joe Jenkins; Carla Moore; Cindy Schaldenbrand; Aviva Goelman; Kay Cantrell; Steve Keiser; County of Orange; Royal TRC, d/b/a Royal Health Care Center; United Western Medical Center; Carole Lipinski; Cheri Blanchard; Fiore, Nordberg, Walker & Woolf-Willis, Defendants-Appellees. Vera Armstrong CHERRY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kay CANTRELL; Fiore, Nordberg, Walker & Woolf-Willis, Defendants-Appellants, and Rocking Horse Ridge Estates; R. Joe Jenkins; Carla Moore; Cindy Schaldenbrand; Aviva Goelman; Steve Keiser; County of Orange; Royal TRC, d/b/a Royal Health Care Center; United Western Medical Center; Carole Lipinski; Cheri Blanchard, Defendants. Nos. 94-56629, 94-56716. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 11, 1996. * Decided June 14, 1996. Before: CANBY, JOHN T. NOONAN, JR., and LEAVY, Circuit…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.