In Re Diamond Bar Estates No. 10, Debtor. Robert Erilane v. Victor F. Thompson Teresa Thompson Alex Labrie Richard Noke

Good Law
87 F.3d 1318·1996 WL 340778·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 31407
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 19, 199695-55517California1,610 words

Opinion

Opinion

87 F.3d 1318 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re DIAMOND BAR ESTATES NO. 10, Debtor. Robert ERILANE, Appellant, v. Victor F. THOMPSON; Teresa Thompson; Alex Labrie; Richard Noke, Appellees. No. 95-55517. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 11, 1996. * Decided June 19, 1996. Before: CANBY, NOONAN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Robert Erilane, the general partner of former Chapter 11 debtor Diamond Bar Estates # 10, appeals pro se the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel's ("BAP") decision affirming the bankruptcy court's grant of summary judgment for defendant limited partners compelling Erilane to turn over certain estate property and damages. Erilane failed to comply with the bankruptcy court's March 1, 1989 Order On Complaint that set forth a distribution scheme of proceeds from the sale of the debtor's only asset. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158 (d). See 28 U.S.C. § 158 (d). We review de novo,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.