Fields v. McKenzie

87 F.3d 1318 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Murray E. FIELDS, II, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Cinthia MCKENZIE, Adult Probation Supervisor; Marla Denim; Adult Probation Department, Maricopa County; Michael Marble, Surveillance Officer; Edward Mansfields, Personnel Supervisor; Glen Scott, Surveillance Officer; Arellie Flores, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-16896. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 11, 1996. * Decided June 19, 1996. Before: CANBY, NOONAN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Murray Eugene Fields, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se the grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants in his action under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 , 1985. Fields claims that employees of the Maricopa County Adult Probation Office violated the Eighth Amendment through their deliberate indifference to his mental illness while he was on probation. The district court concluded Fields had no right to medical care on probation…