Edmond A. Gray v. Tana Wood, Superintendent, Washington State Prison Christine Gregoire, Attorney General, Washington State

87 F.3d 1318 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Edmond A. GRAY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Tana WOOD, Superintendent, Washington State Prison; Christine Gregoire, Attorney General, Washington State, Respondents-Appellees. No. 95-35841. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 11, 1996. * Decided June 19, 1996. Before: CANBY, NOONAN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Edmund A. Gray, a Washington state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition challenging his state parole revocation and sentence, following his plea of guilty to two counts of felony incest. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253 , and we affirm. 3 In 1960, having been convicted of three counts of first degree murder, Gray was sentenced to serve three consecutive life sentences. In 1981, however, Gray was paroled, receiving a conditional release from supervision. In October 1992, Gray was charged…