Golden Cross Care Ii, Inc., D/B/A Golden Cross Health Care of Fresno v. National Labor Relations Board, Hospital & Health Care Workers Union, Local 250, Respondent-Intervenor. National Labor Relations Board v. Golden Cross Care Ii, Inc., D/B/A Golden Cross Health Care of Fresno
Opinion
Opinion
87 F.3d 1318 157 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2064 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. GOLDEN CROSS CARE II, INC., d/b/a Golden Cross Health Care of Fresno, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, Hospital & Health Care Workers Union, Local 250, Respondent-Intervenor. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. GOLDEN CROSS CARE II, INC., d/b/a Golden Cross Health Care of Fresno, Respondent. Nos. 94-70648, 94-70717. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 10, 1996. * Decided June 14, 1996. 1 Before: O'SCANNLAIN and TROTT, Circuit Judges, and VAN SICKLE, District Judge. ** ORDER 2 Having reviewed the Joint Motion, we dismiss the petition and cross application for enforcement. Each party shall bear its own costs. 3 SO ORDERED. * The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); Circuit Rule 34-4 ** The Honorable Bruce M. Van Sickle, Senior United States District Judge for the…