John L. Corrigan v. Sonny Bargala Harold Monteau

87 F.3d 1318 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. John L. CORRIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sonny BARGALA; Harold Monteau, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-36045. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 11, 1996. * Decided June 19, 1996. Before: CANBY, NOONAN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 John L. Corrigan appeals pro se the district court's dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction of his action against Sonny Bargala 1 , Chairman of the Muckleshoot Gaming Commission ("MGC"). Corrigan alleged violations of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, 25 U.S.C. § 2701 et seq., the Federal Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a, and the Right to Financial Privacy Act, 12 U.S.C. § 3401 et seq., arising out of his attempt to obtain employment at the Muckleshoot Indian Casino. 2 The district court dismissed Corrigan's action after determining that Bargala was entitled to sovereign immunity. 3 We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28…