Madhu D. Dalal v. Kaiser Permanente Ken Collings Jim Mathews Darryl Melvin Jim Robinson Dely Tsuchida

87 F.3d 1318 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Madhu D. DALAL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KAISER PERMANENTE; Ken Collings; Jim Mathews; Darryl Melvin; Jim Robinson; Dely Tsuchida, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-55223. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 6, 1996. * Decided June 18, 1996. As Amended on Denial of Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc Aug. 7, 1996. Before: WIGGINS, THOMPSON and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Madhu D. Dalal appeals pro se the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Kaiser Permanente and individual Kaiser employees (collectively "Kaiser") in her employment discrimination action alleging national origin discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (Title VII). Dalal also contends that the district court erred by holding that her various state law claims are preempted by section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act,…