De Long v. Mansfield

87 F.3d 1318 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Steven M. DE LONG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ruth MANSFIELD, Dr.; Gloria Gonzales, L.C.S.W.; Reiko Homma True, Dr.; Patricia Denning, Dr.; Tina Yee, Dr.; City and County of San Francisco Department of Public Health Community Mental Health Services; City and County of San Francisco, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-16713. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 11, 1996. * Decided June 14, 1996. Before: CANBY, JOHN T. NOONAN, JR., and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Steven M. De Long appeals pro se from the district court's judgment for the City and County of San Francisco, the San Francisco Department of Public Health and Community Mental Health Services, and individual employees of the Department of Public Health ("defendants"). The district court dismissed De Long's initial complaint with leave to amend on the basis that his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims were barred by the statute of…