Fort v. Hailey

Good Law
87 F.3d 1318·1996 WL 329748·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 31411
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 14, 199695-35820California2,259 words

Opinion

Opinion

87 F.3d 1318 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Robert Earl FORT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Wayne HAILEY, Nashville Metropolitan Police Detective; Jerry Davis, Nashville Metropolitan Police Detective; James Jarritt, Nashville Metropolitan Police Detective; Fata Thomas, Sheriff Davidson County; Davidson County Tennessee; Darral D. Davidson, Sheriff of Deschutes County; Michael T. Dugan, Deschutes County District Attorney; John Doe, Jail Commander at Davidson County Jail; Deschutes County Sheriff's Department; Lee F. Miller, Detective Deschutes County Sheriffs Department; Randy Smith, Detective Deschutes County Sheriffs Department; Robert Cosner, Detective Deschutes County Sheriffs Department; Marvan Combs, Deschutes County Deputy Sheriff; Deschutes County Jail, Jail Commander; Deschutes County District Attorney; Jushua K. Marquis, Chief Deputy District Attorney; Duane W. Halblieb, Deputy District Attorney Deschutes County; Barbara A. Haslinger, Deschutes County…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.