Hershey v. Santa Clara Valley Humane Soc.

87 F.3d 1319 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Kenneth L. HERSHEY, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SANTA CLARA VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY; Michael S. Frazer, State Humane Officer, Defendants-Appellees, and County of San Benito, The San Benito County Sheriff's Department: Larry Williams, Detective; Richard Brown, County planner; Hollister Animal Control; Chris Williams and Julie Carreiro, Defendants. No. 95-16345. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 11, 1996. * Decided June 14, 1996. Before: CANBY, JOHN T. NOONAN, JR., and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Kenneth L. Hershey, Sr. appeals pro se the dismissal of his civil rights action against the Santa Clara Valley Humane Society and Michael S. Frazer. 1 We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm. 3 Our de novo review of the entire record reveals that the district court properly dismissed Hershey's 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985 claims because he filed the…