Henry

Henry v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department

Good Law
87 F.3d 1319
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 19, 19961319California522 words

Opinion

Opinion

87 F.3d 1319 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Graham S. HENRY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT; Quality Towing of Las Vegas; John Morgan; G.H. Cunningham, Commander; R.F. Smith, Detective; Officer Steven C. # 2844; Detective Leonard; Good, Detective Karen; Joseph Causey; Ken Burbick; Las Vegas Auto and Truck; James Zack, Detective W.T. Flanagan; Tom Dillard, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-16575. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 11, 1996. * Decided June 19, 1996. Before: CANBY, NOONAN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Graham S. Henry, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action pursuant to Heck v. Humphrey, 114 S.Ct. 2364 (1994). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . Reviewing de novo the dismissal under Heck, see Gotcher v. Wood, 66 F.3d 1097, 1099 (9th Cir.1995), petition for cert. filed, 64 U.S.L.W. 3605 (U.S. Feb. 26, 1996) (No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.