Norman Hubbs v. George Smith, Warden Dr. White, Cmo J. Hill, Smta Mta Akin Mta Yarlbourgh
Opinion
Opinion
87 F.3d 1319 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Norman HUBBS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. George SMITH, Warden; Dr. White, CMO; J. Hill, SMTA; MTA Akin; MTA Yarlbourgh, Defendants-Appellees. No. 96-15048. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 11, 1996. * Decided June 18, 1996. Before: CANBY, NOONAN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 California state prisoner Norman Hubbs appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of prison officials in Hubbs's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, alleging he was denied medication and access to physicians, and was assigned to aggravating prison work activities which constituted deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment. For the reasons stated in the Magistrate's Findings Report and Recommendation filed October 12, 1994, we affirm the district court's summary judgment in favor of prison officials. 1 3 AFFIRMED. * The panel unanimously…