Highland Neighborhood Watch Letitia E. Pepper v. Riverside Unified School District James L. Kimble

Good Law
87 F.3d 1319·1996 WL 327096·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 31437
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 12, 199694-55033California1,443 words

Opinion

Opinion

87 F.3d 1319 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. HIGHLAND NEIGHBORHOOD WATCH; Letitia E. Pepper, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. RIVERSIDE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT; James L. Kimble, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-55033. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 9, 1996. Decided June 12, 1996. 1 Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges, and BROWNING, 1 District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM * I. 3 Plaintiffs (Highland Neighborhood Watch and its founder Letitia Pepper (collectively "Highland")) sought the use of Defendants' (Riverside Unified School District and its facility manager James Kimble (collectively "Riverside")) elementary school for Highland's meeting place. Highland is a neighborhood watch group formed in response to growing crime in the immediate neighborhood. To meet at Riverside's school facilities, it was necessary to fill out an application in advance of the proposed meeting. In some cases, insurance was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.