Hallock v. City of Rohnert Park

87 F.3d 1319 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Keith H. HALLOCK, dba Hallock Enterprises, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Sandra Hallock, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF ROHNERT PARK; Jimmie Rogers; Mark Jacobson; Donald Davis; Arthur Condiotti; Phil Trowbridge, Condiotti Enterprises, Linda Spiro, Charlie Cochran, Peter Callinan, Paul Skanchy, Joseph Netter, Carl Lievo, Ron Brust, Da80, Debra Investment Corporation; Koala Springs Co., Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-16836. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 11, 1996. * Decided June 19, 1996. Before: CANBY, NOONAN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Keith Hallock appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his complaint against various defendants for failure to state a claim pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Hallock contends that appellees participated in a pattern of racketeering activity which prevented him from developing his real property. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C.…