Jose Maria Jimenez-Solorzano v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Opinion
Opinion
87 F.3d 1319 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jose Maria JIMENEZ-SOLORZANO, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 94-70191. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 16, 1995. * Decided June 26, 1996. 1 Before: BRUNETTI and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges, and HAGEN, ** District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Petitioner does not dispute he's been convicted of an aggravated felony within the meaning of 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a)(1). Therefore, to be entitled to consideration of the merits of his petition for review, he had to file it not later than 30 days after the date of issuance of his final deportation order. 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a)(1); Lee v. INS, 685 F.2d 343, 343 (9th Cir.1982). Petitioner's final deportation order was issued March 22, 1994, making the filing deadline for his petition April 21, 1994. His petition wasn't filed until April 25, however, rendering it untimely. 4 We note that petitioner doesn't…