Holt v. Munitz

87 F.3d 1319 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Robert T. HOLT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Barry MUNITZ; Chancellor of California State University; Belenda Wilson, President, California State University, Northridge; Carolyn Ellner; Leo Kryzwkowski; Arlinda Eaton; Kayte Fearn; Cynthia Desrochers; George Barker; Patricia Tsuruda; Alexi Brown; Mack Johnson, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-56630. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 11, 1996. * Decided June 19, 1996. Before: CANBY, NOONAN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Robert T. Holt, a former student at California State University at Northridge, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging a violation of his right of free speech and his guarantee of due process of law. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo the district court's grant of summary judgment, see Jesinger v. Nevada Fed.…