Hershey v. California State Humane Soc.

87 F.3d 1319 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Kenneth L. HERSHEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA STATE HUMANE SOCIETY; Michael S. Fraser; Santa Clara Valley Humane Society; Harvey S. Nyland, Sheriff; Curtis Hill, Sheriff; The San Benito County Sheriff's Department; Hollister Police Department; Harry Damkarr, District Attorney; Richard Brown, Detective of the San Benito County Planning Commission; San Benito County Animal Control; Chris Williams, Julie Carreiro; Dan Winn; Camarino Sanchez; Mike Bath; David P. Blair and Larry Wilson, M.D.; Humane Society of Santa Clara Valley, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-16917. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 11, 1996. * Decided June 14, 1996. Before: CANBY, JOHN T. NOONAN, JR., and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Kenneth L. Hershey appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment dismissal of his civil rights and Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), 18…