Chuck Johnson v. Peter S. Krohn, Jane Doe Krohn, Husband and Wife Jane Doe Wertanen, John Doe Wertanen, Husband and Wife, Chuck Johnson v. Peter S. Krohn Jane Doe Krohn, Husband and Wife, and John Doe Wertanen Jane Doe Wertanen, Husband and Wife

87 F.3d 1320 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Chuck JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Peter S. KROHN, Jane Doe Krohn, husband and wife; Jane Doe Wertanen, John Doe Wertanen, husband and wife, Defendants-Appellees. Chuck JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Peter S. KROHN; Jane Doe Krohn, husband and wife, Defendants, and John Doe Wertanen; Jane Doe Wertanen, husband and wife, Defendants-Appellants. No. 94-36158, 94-36189. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 10, 1996. Decided June 07, 1996. Before: WRIGHT, PREGERSON, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Plaintiff Chuck Johnson appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendant Officers Peter Krohn and Don Wertanen. Defendant Officer Wertanen also appeals the district court's order denying his motion for attorney's fees. The district court had jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 . We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We…