Mahon v. Prunty

87 F.3d 1320 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Johnnie Ray MAHON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. K.W. PRUNTY, Chief Deputy Warden; P-Washington, Program Administrator, individually and in his official capacity; Garcia, CCI, individually and in his/her official capacity, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-56849. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 11, 1996. * Decided June 18, 1996. Before: CANBY, NOONAN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Johnnie Ray Mahon, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of prison officials in Mahon's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm. 3 Mahon was removed from his prison job and placed on Group C work status for his repeated failure to report to his work assignment. Mahon alleged that his due process rights were violated because the prison officials failed to provide him with adequate notice of…