Jagdish C. Laul v. Battelle Memorial Institute, a Non-Profit Organization

Good Law
87 F.3d 1320·1996 WL 328791·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 31563
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 14, 199695-35156California2,368 words

Opinion

Opinion

87 F.3d 1320 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jagdish C. LAUL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTE, a non-profit organization, Defendant-Appellee. No. 95-35156. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued April 11, 1996. Submission Deferred April 11, 1996. Resubmitted April 30. Decided June 14, 1996. Before: WRIGHT, PREGERSON, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges. ORDER This case is hereby resubmitted effective April 30, 1996. Before: WRIGHT, PREGERSON, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Plaintiff-Appellant Jagdish C. Laul ("Dr. Laul") appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellee Battelle Memorial Institute ("Battelle"). Dr. Laul alleges breach of employment contract, wrongful discharge in violation of Washington public policy because of his whistleblowing activities, and unlawful discharge from employment because of his race in violation of Washington Law Against Discrimination,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.