Randy Allen Myers v. J.W. Huskey, Warden

Good Law
87 F.3d 1321·1996 WL 328798·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 31482
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 14, 199695-15591California471 words

Opinion

Opinion

87 F.3d 1321 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Randy Allen MYERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J.W. HUSKEY, Warden, Defendant-Appellee. No. 95-15591. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 11, 1996. * Decided June 14, 1996. Before: CANBY, JOHN T. NOONAN, Jr., and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Randy Allen Myers, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of defendant Huskey in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review summary judgment de novo, Jesinger v. Nevada Fed. Credit Union, 24 F.3d 1127, 1130 (9th Cir.1994), and affirm. 3 Prisoners objecting to conditions of their confinement are required to satisfy both an objective and subjective component to the challenge. Farmer v. Brennan, 114 S.Ct. 1970, 1977 (1994); Allen v. Sakai, 48 F.3d 1082, 1083 (9th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 115 S.Ct. 1695 (1995). To withstand a motion for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.