Ruby Russell v. General Telephone Company of California the Communication Workers of America Richard Reno Larry Bligh

87 F.3d 1321 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ruby RUSSELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA; the Communication Workers of America; Richard Reno; Larry Bligh, Defendant-Appellees. No. 94-56594. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 11, 1996. Decided June 21, 1996. 1 Before: SCHROEDER and LEAVY, Circuit Judges, and TRIMBLE * District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Ruby Russell (Russell) appeals a judgment entered against her after a two day bench trial in which the district court found for defendants as to Russell's complaint claiming a hostile working environment, retaliation, and disparate treatment under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000 (e) et seq. The district court made findings concerning the conduct of Russell's supervisor, Richard Reno (Reno), holding that such conduct did not establish a hostile working environment. Russell maintained three distinctive…