Susan Nameth v. Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner, Social Security Administration

87 F.3d 1321 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Susan NAMETH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner, Social Security Administration * , Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-36215. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 10, 1996. Decided June 4, 1996. Before: GOODWIN, SKOPIL and SCHROEDER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Plaintiff Susan Nameth appeals the judgment of the district court affirming the final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration denying her disability benefits under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 401 et seq. (the "Act"). 3 The Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ") after a hearing, denied disability benefits, finding the petitioner not disabled within the meaning of the Act. The district court affirmed. 4 Our review is limited to the question whether the findings of the ALJ are supported by substantial evidence in the record as a whole and based upon…