Porter v. City of Burbank

87 F.3d 1321 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Carl PORTER, dba Federal Fugitive Apprehension; John Dallas, dba Federal Fugitive Apprehension; Daniel Howley; Mrs. Carl Porter, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF BURBANK; Jerome H. Gibbons, Officer; Dennis A. Fischer, Officer; David Newsham, Chief of Police; Robert Heins, Captain; Joseph Fletcher, City Attorney, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-56718. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 21, 1996. * Decided June 13, 1996. Before: CHOY, SNEED, and SKOPIL, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Carl Porter, John Dallas and Maria Porter appeal from the district court summary judgment in favor of Officer Gibbons, Officer Fischer and the City of Burbank in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action. We affirm. Factual and Procedural Background 3 Porter and Dallas own the Federal Fugitive Apprehension Company. On April 27, 1992, Porter and his employee Daniel Howley notified the Burbank Police…