Wenda Shaltry v. United States of America
Opinion
Opinion
87 F.3d 1322 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Wenda SHALTRY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-15340. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 29, 1996. Decided June 26, 1995. Before: ALARCON, BEEZER and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Plaintiff Wenda K. Shaltry appeals the district court's dismissal of her claims under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b). Shaltry filed suit after she was removed from the panel of Chapter 7 bankruptcy trustees for the District of Arizona. She asserted claims under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), the Fifth Amendment's liberty and property due process guarantees, and tort law. The district court dismissed her claims. Shaltry filed a timely notice of appeal, and we have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We affirm. 3 * Shaltry was appointed to a membership on the panel of Chapter 7 bankruptcy trustees for the District of Arizona in April,…