Darrell D. Smith v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company of Bloomington, Illinois, an Illinois Corporation

87 F.3d 1322 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Darrell D. SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY OF BLOOMINGTON, ILLINOIS, An Illinois Corporation, Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-35999. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 11, 1996. * Decided June 19, 1996. Before: CANBY, NOONAN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Darrell Smith appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company ("State Farm"). Smith alleged that State Farm abused the legal process and violated his constitutional rights by wrongfully bringing a default order against him, which prevented him from renewing his Oregon driver's license for several months. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 Smith contends that the district court erred by granting summary judgment for State Farm because State Farm failed to comply with Local Rule 220-9,…