In re Three Thirteen Stratford

87 F.3d 1322 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re THREE THIRTEEN STRATFORD, a California General Partnership, a Debtor in Possession in Chapter 11. THREE THIRTEEN STRATFORD, a California General Partnership, a Debtor in Possession in Chapter 11; Arthur G. Lawrence; and Lorraine Howell, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY THRIFT AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, a California corporation; Naftali Deutsch; Lawrence Deutsch; DRG/Crescent Canon, Ltd., a California limited partnership; Ernie Goldberger; Regine Goldberger; Charlene Case; Irving Kaufman and Mona Kaufman, as Trustees of the Irving Kaufman Accountancy Pension Plan; Alan Karme; Flagship Financial Services, a California corporation; and Metro Reconveyance Corp., a California corporation, inclusive, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-56367. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submission Deferred March 7, 1996. Submitted March 11, 1996. Decided June 11, 1996. Before: CANBY, BOOCHEVER, and LEAVY, Circuit…