Stanley Ezell Singleton v. Kenneth Ingalls R. Ramis, Parole Agent

87 F.3d 1322 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Stanley Ezell SINGLETON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kenneth INGALLS; R. Ramis, parole agent, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-56371. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 11, 1996. * Decided June 18, 1996. Before: CANBY, NOONAN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Stanley Ezell Singleton, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo a district court's Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) dismissal for failure to state a claim, see Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Dep't, 901 F.2d 696, 699 (9th Cir.1990), and we agree with the district court that Singleton's complaint failed to state a cognizable claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 . AFFIRMED. 1 * The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P.…